First and foremost, stay tuned after the introverted portion of this post for my weekly power rankings, to be included in this post from here on out in hopes of avoiding the absent-mindedness that kept me from posting any after week 3.
Last week, I speculated that my days as a better than .500 predictor of NFL games may soon be coming to an end if rather prominent trends (i.e. my percentage of correct picks decreasing on a weekly basis) didn't reverse themselves. Following a 9-5 week, bringing my record to 43-19 on the season, I'm officially on mediocrity watch. Let's take a look at what went wrong:
Lessons Learned from the Games I Missed
Cincinnati at Cleveland: While doing my projections, I couldn't see the difference between the two teams from Ohio. By the time they played this game, it was rather obvious. I don't think the Bengals are anywhere near as good as their 3-1 record, but they're playing much better defense than they have in years and, at least momentarily, they're getting enough out of Cedric Benson to keep defenses "honest," opening up opportunities for Carson Palmer in the passing game. Couple a Bengals team which looks like it's solidly mediocre with a Browns team that is somehow even worse than I thought they were, and falling further into disarray every week, and it wasn't hard to see this missed pick coming at all.
Jacksonville at Tennessee: As far as I was able to tell entering the season, I was actually less impressed with the Titans than almost anyone. I mean, I only had them at 8-8. But not even I had any idea how big the step backwards their defense was taking would be. It's one thing to give up 31 points to the Texans, who are a stacked at the skill positions better than perhaps any team in the NFL, but to allow the Jags and Jets to put up 60+ points in the two games which followed is simply pathetic. Kerry Collins and the Tennessee offense is actually performing better than most of us expected them to be, but with a defense that's giving San Diego, Cleveland, and Tampa a run for the worst in football, it doesn't matter in the slightest. The way this team is playing, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they're the ones in control of which team gets to trade into the #1 slot in the draft to take Sam Bradford.
San Francisco at St. Louis: This was a very similar situation to the Ohio bowl I outlined above. I didn't give either of these teams much credit, at all, entering the season, though I did think San Francisco was the better of the two. But as a general rule, when picking between two teams I would describe as "awful," I pick the one playing at home. Honestly, I don't even think SF is much better than I thought they were. Slightly better defense than anticipated, but a passing game which still isn't good enough to win from behind. However, given the problems Arizona has right now, I'd be pretty surprised if the 49ers don't win the NFC West, officially cementing their position as the tallest midgets. Who else thinks any division with an overall sub-.500 record should lead to automatic realignment? What fun are the playoffs when only 10 of the 12 teams which make it have any right to be there?
Dallas at Denver: You would think that I must've learned something positive about the Broncos, who have now won more games than I thought they would all year, now that they're sitting at 4-0. You would be wrong. This game taught me, as I had already suspected, that Dallas is going to have to overachieve to get to mediocrity. The Cowboys are, without a doubt, a bad football team. Their defense is absolutely pathetic against the pass, as is their passing game. They're not terrible at running the ball or stopping others from doing so, which is the only thing keeping them in games, but as comfortable as opposing quarterbacks look in the pocket and as awful as the Cowboys' secondary is at tackling, it literally doesn't matter. So what is supposed to impress me about the Broncos managing all of 17 points against them? Denver isn't anywhere near as bad as I thought they were, I'll grant that, but I can't really get excited about their defense allowing 26 points through four games when the first three of them came against the Bengals, Browns, and Raiders. It'll be fun to see how many times over the season's final 12 games the Broncos allow more points in one week than they did in the first four.
Green Bay at Minnesota: The Vikings are better, and the Packers worse, than I expected. Actually, to be specific, the Packers are worse than I expected and the Vikings are better than I had hoped. Green Bay's defense, which was supposed to be an aggressive, zone blitzing 3-4 unit in the mold of the Steelers and Patriots, hasn't been generating even a little bit of pressure. In fact, they have managed to turn their best pass rusher, Aaron Kampman, into perhaps the worst pass covering linebacker in football. It's like watching Chris Gocong if he had played as a rookie. Compounding matters, the Pack hasn't coped at all with the loss of starting left tackle Chad Clifton, robbing Aaron Rodgers and his stellar group of receivers of anything resembling the time necessary to get the ball down the field. The good news for the Packers, and for those of us who thought they'd be an elite team, is that these should be correctable issues. Meanwhile, the Vikings have looked like everything I, a proud Favre-hater, was praying they wouldn't be. They still have some trouble with quarterbacks who have time, but with the best defensive line in football with the best pass rusher at the end of it, not too many have. It still makes me wanna puke, though.
Power Rankings
1. Giants - If Eli's play is significantly hampered in the long term by his injury, the G-Men won't stay atop the rankings for too long, but at the moment, they're the best team. New Orleans and the Colts are flashier and the Vikings will get more headlines as long as they have Favre, but it's as simple as this: of the four teams, the Giants and Vikings run the ball better, which will always give them a leg up against the pass-happy Saints and Colts. Perhaps more importantly, the Giants still have a stable full of pass rushers along the defensive line which continue to give opposing quarterbacks fits on third down. How do you beat a team which brings as much pressure rushing three or four as most teams do on an all-out blitz? Much as I hate to say it, I just don't think you do.
2. Saints - At first glance, it would appear the Saints' quick passing game is the answer to my last question. Teams which put pressure on Drew Bress, or at least the teams that try to, find themselves burned by quick passes and, inevitably, end up taking their chances in zone coverage. The problem I find myself running into when it comes to beating the Giants that way is that, generally, the Giants don't have to rush more than 4 to create the sort of pressure most teams blitzes do. Quick passing will back a heavy blitz off every time, but when the pressure is all coming from in front of a typical zone coverage, there won't be anywhere to go with the football. Luckily for New Orleans, there's exactly one team in the NFL capable of generating that kind of a pass rush entirely from along the defensive line.
No comments:
Post a Comment